Mold Help Discussion Board Forum Index Mold Help Discussion Board
Information, answers, solutions. . .
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Letter from Mold Doctor

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Mold Help Discussion Board Forum Index -> Mold Issues
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GoTimothy2



Joined: 29 Sep 2005
Posts: 187
Location: MI

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 7:48 am    Post subject: Letter from Mold Doctor Reply with quote

Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 17:18:27 -0500
Reply-To: "Ronald E. Gots" <regots@ICTM.COM>
Sender: Occupational & Environmental Medicine for Clinicians & Public
Health Professionals <Occ-Env-Med-L@MC.DUKE.EDU>
From: "Ronald E. Gots" <regots@ICTM.COM>
Subject: Re: ACOEM mold position paper
Comments: To: Occ-Env-Med-L@mc.duke.edu
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.5.2.20021105134348.01bcb700@postoffice.dps.uiuc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Mold Position Paper

> I have reviewed thoroughly the position paper just published by the
> American College of Occupational and Enviromental Medicine rergarding the
> state--of-the-science re mold and mold toxins. I find it
> well-researched, comprehensive and accurately reflecting today's
> scientific knowledge. Dr. Harbut has made two suggestions or requests
> regarding this paper. First, he critically notes that only one of the
> authors is a physician who has seen patients following mold
> exposures. As both an M.D. and a Ph.D. I say that that is as it should
> be. Individuals trained in science and the scientific method, i.e. those
> with a proper Ph.D. education are expert (far more so than most M.D.s) at
> judging the quality of research studies. Secondly, they are less likely
> to be influenced by personal attribution biases. His other point dealt
> with the authors' appearances as experts in these matters. It would
> likely be hard to find indiviudals knowledgable in mold/health science
> who have not made such appearances considering the volatile, adversarial
> nature of the issue today. And, if that were a criterion for dismissing
> their careful review, by the same reasoning, would we dismiss every
> commonly-cited, published author who deals with this subject--Drs.
> Johanning, Morey, Jarvis, Chin Yang and maybe Dr. Harbut himself--among
> others. All have testified in mold matters. I have as well. The
> meaningful criteria for evaluation and interpretation of scientific
> literature lies in the reviewers' understanding of experimental design,
> the criteria for quality versus marginal research and in the fundamental
> science of causation assessment. The authors of the ACOEM document have
> demonstrated these abilities.



Ronald E. Gots, M.D., Ph.D.
International Center for Toxicology and Medicine
Georgetown University School of Medicine
regots@ictm.com
_________________
Copywrite 2005 By Timothy Allen Campbell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Mold Help Discussion Board Forum Index -> Mold Issues All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Space Pilot 3K template by Jakob Persson.
Powered by phpBB 2001 phpBB Group

TOXIC MOLD

http://www.mold-help.org

The most comprehensive mold website with complete information on toxic mold (stachybotrys, penicillium, aspergillus, fusarium, chaetomium, and cladosporium) . Images, physicians list, symptoms, medical updates, descriptions, discussion board, and several other topics.